April 18, 2016
by Seth Avery, AppRev President and CEO
Everyone has a favorite denial. More specifically, everyone has a favorite Claim Adjustment Reason Code (CARC). You know CARCs…those annoying adjustment codes on your remits. The CARCs are supposed to tell us why Payers value our carefully crafted claim at zero.
I review hundreds of claim and remit figures from hundreds of hospitals every year. You’re jealous, I can tell. My expedition into this deep mine of data does yield a nugget of gold every once in a while.
My current love is CARC #13, “Date of Death Precedes Service.” Sounds like a fatal denial, huh? But it most certainly is not. I have customers who overturn it more than 50% of the time. Not surprisingly, most of the denials are Medicare.
What happened to this unfortunate patient? Were services not provided to them after they passed away? Of course, it’s more likely that the date of service is simply incorrect.
Here’s what I tell my customers about management of all denials, not just the outlandish ones: Regardless of the approach you take to denials management, be sure that each and every denial is clearly identified and has a dedicated staff member assigned to resolving it.
By approaching denials management issue by issue, you will soon see your total and average recovery rising. And who knows? Your career might just rise along with it.
June 5, 2012
Readmissions are no new occurrence in hospitals and with 20 percent of Medicare patients readmitted a year, they also are not uncommon. Medcap reported that readmissions within 30 days accounts for 15 billion dollars of Medicare spending. New legislation signed into law by President Obama will penalize those hospitals that have high preventable readmission rates.
Why the penalty for readmissions? Beyond the exorbitant cost to Medicare each year, readmissions often mean poor quality of care. Research shows that patients who were readmitted were 55 percent more likely to have had a quality of care problem.
But, with the current Medicare fee for service are hospitals really incentivized to decrease their readmissions? Hospitals are paid per discharge, not by the amount of time a patient is in their care, or the quality of care they provide. A hospital with poor discharge instructions (more likely to readmit) receives the same fee as a hospital with top quality discharge instructions. So, is it really surprising hospitals are having high readmission rates?
What do these penalties look like? The Center for Medicare and Medicaid finalized the calculation of a hospital’s excessive readmission ratio for Acute Myocardial Infraction, Heart Failure and Pneumonia. The ratio compares a hospital’s readmission rate to the national average. CMS will use the risk adjustment methodology (endorsed by the National Quality forum), which takes into account factors such as demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and patient frailty.
The result is this ratio:
Excess readmission ratio (finalized in FY 2012 IPPS/ LTCH PPS rule) = risk-adjusted predicted readmissions/ risk-adjusted expected readmissions
The penalties will be in effect beginning FY 2014 and will result in a one to three percent pay reduction.
Are these reductions enough to encourage hospitals to invest in changes to reduce readmissions? Since other payers are behind Medicare in their ability to penalize, hospitals may be giving up revenue from other payers by reducing readmissions. If a hospital avoids a readmission can they replace that admission with patients waiting for a bed? If the bed remains empty how much variable cost can the hospital avoid?
These are factors that hospitals must consider in building a complete picture of the financial impact of readmission strategies.